Faster investigations
Turn repetitive investigation work into a structured workflow.
Turn Compliance Alerts Into Investigation-Ready Decisions.
CIP is an AI investigation assistant that investigates compliance alerts, gathers evidence and prepares an audit-ready case for human review.
- Your screening toolfinds the alert.
- CIPinvestigates it.
- Your analystmakes the decision.
The problem
Every Alert Demands an Investigation.
Screening tools are built to flag possible matches. Deciding whether a flag is real is a separate job, and today it is mostly manual.
For every alert, an analyst has to
- Compare customer details
- Investigate identity
- Search news
- Search court sources
- Review regulatory sources
- Check sanctions and PEP data
- Decide if the match is genuine
- Document the reasoning
- Prepare evidence for auditors
Repetitive workSlow investigationInconsistent analysisHard-to-follow documentationHigh false-positive loadPressure on compliance teams
Illustration · manual investigation today
Alert
Search
Compare
Search again
Verify
Document
Review
Context switches 0Searches run 0Notes copied by hand 0
Where CIP fits
Put Investigation Between the Alert and the Decision.
CIP
CIP takes the alert, sets the investigation depth from your rules, confirms identity, researches sanctions, PEP and media sources, has findings reviewed, and prepares the report and recommendation.
The bank keeps its existing screening tool.
The bank keeps the final decision.
CIP handles the investigation in between.
What changes
Investigation Work, Done the Same Way Every Time.
Consistent analysis
Apply the same investigation discipline across cases.
Evidence-backed reports
Every finding is tied to its source.
Audit-ready trail
Searches, sources and decisions are recorded throughout the case.
8Steps from alert to decision
6Investigation roles
3Levels of investigation depth
7Safety principles
1Shared case file per alert
Your screening tool finds the alert.CIP investigates it.Your analyst makes the decision.
See a full investigation on a sample case, and how CIP would sit inside your existing screening workflow.
Home/Product
CIP — Compliance Intelligence PlatformAn investigation assistant built for the work between screening and decision.
CIP receives an alert from your existing screening tool, investigates it the way a skilled compliance analyst would, and hands back a finished, evidence-backed investigation file. Your analyst makes the call.
CASE-2026-0418
Investigation complete
Sample case · fictional data
Customer
RM
Rohan MehtaCUST-77310
Alert sourceScreening tool
List matchedSanctions entry
Vendor score82 / 100
Risk ratingMedium
DepthMedium · policy
StatusAwaiting analyst
Lines of investigation
IdentityNot confirmed · DOB and city conflict
ConflictSanctionsList entry describes a different person
OpenedPEPNo PEP record for the customer
ClearMedia2 articles · about the listed person
Not the customerEvidence7 sources · each with check date
ReviewedRecommendationLikely false alarm · recommend close
Listed person differs on date of birth and city. One open question: the list entry has no address to compare.
Audit trail
- Alert received · CUST-77310AUD-0418-01
What CIP checks
One Alert. Multiple Lines of Investigation.
Identity comes first. Only once CIP knows whether the flagged record is really your customer does deeper research carry weight.
The output
One Finished Investigation File. Everything in One Place.
What your analyst opens when CIP is done. This example is escalated, to show how CIP handles a case that is not a false alarm.
Kavita Sharma · sample, fictional
Escalate for deeper reviewCASE-2026-0507 · PEP alert · depth: High
See the file CIP would hand your analysts.
We'll walk through a complete sample investigation and discuss how CIP would receive alerts from your current screening tool.
Home/Solutions
SolutionsOne Investigation Discipline, Shaped to Your Institution.
Banks, NBFCs and fintechs carry different alert volumes, team sizes and policies. CIP follows your rules for depth and escalation, and fits after the screening tool you already run.
Outcome figures below are left blank on purpose. We measure them with each institution during a pilot rather than publishing numbers we haven't earned.
01 · Banks
Book a Demo
Investigate alerts more efficiently and consistently.
Large alert queues across branches and products, and an audit expectation that every closure can be explained. CIP turns each alert into the same structured, source-backed file.
- Depth follows your risk tiers and list types
- Probable sanctions matches always escalated
- Every decision written to the audit trail
—Alerts per month · your figure
—Analyst time per alert · baseline in pilot
—Files with complete evidence · measured together
ALERT QUEUE · SAMPLECIP investigating
ALT-2291Sanctions list hit · retailFile ready
ALT-2292PEP hit · private bankingResearching
ALT-2293Media hit · corporateFile ready
ALT-2294Sanctions list hit · tradeEscalated
ALT-2295PEP hit · retailIdentity check
02 · NBFCs
Book a Demo
Structure investigations and documentation across alert volumes.
Lean compliance teams often carry the same documentation burden as much larger institutions. CIP produces a consistent file for every alert, so the paperwork no longer depends on who picked it up.
- Same sections, same evidence standard on every case
- Open questions stated plainly, not buried
- A record auditors can follow from alert to decision
—Alert volume · your figure
—Documentation time · baseline in pilot
—Audit queries per file · measured together
INVESTIGATION FILE · SAMPLEHover to open
01 · IDENTITY
02 · SOURCES
03 · REPORTRecommendation
03 · Fintechs
Book a Demo
An investigation workflow that grows with your team.
Fast customer growth brings alert growth before it brings compliance headcount. CIP gives a growing team a structured workflow, without every alert becoming a long manual exercise.
- Works after the screening tool you already use
- Your policies set how deep each case goes
- Analysts review finished files instead of building them
—Monthly alerts · your figure
—Backlog age · baseline in pilot
—Cases per analyst · measured together
ALERT FLOW · ILLUSTRATION
Manual
With CIP
Screening
Your existing tool
Investigation
CIP
Decision
Your analyst
Record
Audit trail
04 · Compliance teams
Book a Demo
A finished investigation file instead of a blank page.
Analysts spend their judgement on the decision, not on assembling evidence. Each file arrives with findings, sources, open questions and a recommendation they can approve, change or reject.
- Every finding links to the source that was opened
- Weak findings sent back before they reach you
- Your decision recorded with the case
—Time to first review · baseline in pilot
—Rework on files · measured together
—Analyst feedback · collected in pilot
CASE-2026-0507Awaiting analyst
- IdentityConfirmed on DOB and cityDone
- Sanctions & PEPPEP role confirmedDone
- News & legal3 items · status preservedDone
- Open questions3 listed for the analystFlagged
RecommendationEscalate for deeper review
Investigation depth
The Deeper the Risk, the Wider the Investigation.
Your rules set the starting depth for each case. Try a tier, then simulate a finding.
- Identity checkLow
- List-entry comparisonLow
- Quick news sweepLow
- Cross-checking sourcesMedium
- PEP role verificationMedium
- Regional-language sourcesHigh
- Related people and companiesHigh
- Full contradiction analysisHigh
Depth can increase when something is found. It never decreases.
A finding can push a case deeper mid-investigation. Nothing pulls it back to a lighter check.
Tell us how your alerts flow today.
We'll show how CIP would sit after your current screening tool, and agree together which outcomes to measure in a pilot.
Home/Trust & Safety
Trust & SafetyDesigned for Investigation. Built for Human Oversight.
CIP is held to rules a compliance officer would recognise. Each layer of an investigation rests on the one below it, and every layer is written to the audit trail as it happens.
Human decisionApprove, change or reject
FinalReport & recommendationOnly verified findings
05Independent reviewEvery finding re-checked
04Findings tied to sourcesNo source, no claim
03Identity confirmed firstA name match is never enough
02Sources actually openedOfficial lists and licensed sources
01
Seven principles
The Rules CIP Does Not Bend.
Human Always Decides
CIP recommends. A person on your compliance team makes the final decision, every time.
CIP · recommendsAnalyst · decidesRecorded
No Source, No Claim
Every statement in the investigation points to a source that was actually opened.
Director of 2 firms↗ opened 18 Oct
A Name Match Is Never Enough
Additional identity information must support any conclusion that the record is the customer.
Rohan Mehta ≈ Rohan Mehtaa
DOB ✕City ✕Not confirmed
Facts Are Never Exaggerated
If the source says "alleged", the investigation says "alleged".
Source:Alleged
Report:AllegedConvicted
Required Checks Cannot Be Skipped
Every case covers the required investigation areas before a report can be written.
✓ Identity✓ Sanctions✓ PEP✓ Media
Probable Sanctions Matches Are Escalated
CIP must not recommend clearing a probable sanctions match.
Probable sanctions match
Everything Is Recorded
Searches, sources and decisions are recorded as the investigation happens, not reconstructed afterwards.
AUD-0418-03Identity compared on 4 factors
AUD-0418-06Article opened · national daily
AUD-0418-14Analyst decision: approved
Restraint by design
Built to Do One Thing Extremely Well.
CIP investigates alerts. These are the things it deliberately does not try to be.
NOTA screening tool
Your institution keeps its existing screening system. CIP starts where that system's alert ends.
NOTIts own sanctions or news database
CIP uses official lists and licensed sources rather than trying to become a data provider.
NOTA decision-maker
It does not close alerts on its own or file regulatory reports. It prepares the case; your team decides.
NOTA fixed 0–100 risk score engine
The investigation follows your institution's own policies, and a human makes the final decision.
NOTA cast of AI personas for show
A small number of functional investigation roles, designed around how an investigation actually runs.
Bring your toughest questions about oversight.
We'll show exactly where your analysts review, what gets recorded, and how CIP handles cases it cannot resolve.
Home/Company & Team
About VrenceS TechnologiesA technology company building intelligent infrastructure for financial compliance.
Our mission
Make complex compliance investigation more structured, evidence-backed and efficient, while keeping humans firmly in control.
Why the investigation layer
Financial institutions already invest in screening. The harder, slower part comes after the alert: working out whether a flagged record is really the customer, reading the sources, and writing down why.
That is the work we build for. CIP sits between the screening tool and the compliance analyst, prepares the investigation, and leaves the decision where it belongs.
We are starting with compliance teams at Indian banks, NBFCs and fintechs.
How we work
Ambitious About the Problem. Careful About the Claims.
01
Humans stay in control
We build tools that prepare decisions. We don't build tools that take them.
02
Evidence first
If a finding can't point to its source, it doesn't belong in the report.
03
Restraint by design
We do one job well rather than becoming another screening tool or data provider.
04
Built for Indian institutions
Designed around how compliance teams at banks, NBFCs and fintechs actually work.
8Investigation steps
6Functional roles
3Depth levels
7Safety principles
1Human decision per case
Team
Built by People Who Care About the Problem.
VrenceS Technologies is led by its two co-founders.
CEO
E. Viswanathan Harri
CEO — VrenceS Technologies
TECHNICAL CO-FOUNDER & CTO
S. Subinav
Technical Co-Founder & CTO — VrenceS Technologies
Get in touch
Talk to the people building CIP.
Email
info@vrencestechnologies.com
Home/Book a Demo
Book a DemoSee What an Investigation-Ready Workflow Looks Like.
Tell us a little about your organisation and compliance workflow. We'll show you how CIP can fit between your existing screening process and analyst decision-making.